The CPU dependency is what separates the E from its larger, more expensive competitors here. Very Good for the Money I want to say that lately we’ve seen a resurgence in the importance of integrated graphics, but I don’t know that it ever was truly important. Crysis – GPU Benchmark Brazos aims to change that. The Motivation and the Introduction The Price: The frame rates are still not high enough to get excited, but the effort is top notch.
|Date Added:||10 August 2004|
|File Size:||53.38 Mb|
|Operating Systems:||Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Intel’s Atom D can complete our benchmark here but at a laughable 4. Modern Warfare 2 paints an even better picture for AMD.
AMD Radeon HD video card benchmark result – AMD E,ASRock EM1
We ran at x For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List. This is unsurprising as the two have very similar compute capabilities and only differ in the amount of available memory bandwidth since the Radeon HD doesn’t have to share amd radeon 6310 a neighboring CPU.
We ran at x with graphics and amd radeon 6310 quality both set to low. Metro We’re using the Metro benchmark that ships with the game. Log in Don’t have an account?
Sign up now Username Password Remember Me.
AMD Radeon HD – Tech
The Raden performance isn’t too amd radeon 6310 off the Core i3 either. The Bobcat cores at work in the E help give it a significant advantage over anything paired with Atom. For our Civilization V test we’re using the game’s built in lateGameView benchmark.
GeForce GT Desktop. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems.
The E is faster than Amd radeon 6310 but not in the realm of playability. The E still isn’t enough to play all modern games, but it’s what I would consider an acceptable entry level GPU. Radeon HD compare.
For detailled information amd radeon 6310 the benchmark results, click on the fps number. Mobility Radeon HD Crossfire. The 3D performance of the HD should be amd radeon 6310 a HD due to the missing dedicated graphics memory shared memory only.
The GPU test is mostly a navigate-around-the-map test, as scrolling and panning around tends to xmd the most GPU bound in the game. The past two years have shown us that Intel is starting to take GPU performance seriously. In the following list you can select and also search for devices that should be added to the comparison. Let’s get to the numbers. Radeon RX Desktop. I ran at the lowest quality settings at x DAO has been a staple of our integrated graphics benchmark for some time now.
While none of these frame rates are what I’d call smooth, you can’t argue with how radeoj the E is here. Post Your Comment Please log in or sign up amd radeon 6310 comment. The CPU dependency is what separates the E from its larger, more expensive competitors here.
The Brazos Review: AMD’s E-350 Supplants ION for mini-ITX
Even the next-generation ION only manages You’ll see a number of games where compatibility is a problem for the D While amd radeon 6310 D can technically run this test, it does so at only 7 fps. Metro is a bit too modern for these low end platforms. The Amd radeon 6310 HD Very Good for the Money General Performance: